Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • 10 of the Best Hardcore Anti-Abortion Anthems
  • Why didn’t Frank Ritchie Disclose he was until recently a Green Party Member?
  • Exposed: Greens’ Abortion Policy Written by ALRANZ
  • Here are 10 Ways You Can Reclaim Language for LIFE
  • “I’m Not Called To Fight Abortion”

Most Used Categories

  • Abortion (168)
  • Commentary (21)
  • Freedom (12)
  • This is Abortion (9)
  • Top Posts (7)
  • Vlog (7)
  • Video (7)
  • News (2)
  • Quote (2)
  • Abolitionism (2)
Skip to content

thirtyone8

open your mouth for the speechless

Subscribe
  • Home
  • Commentary
  • This is Abortion
  • Vlog
  • Videos
  • Quotes
  • Home
  • The Facebook Incident

The Facebook Incident

AndyOctober 21, 2009

On Thursday 15 I looked at my Feedjit and found that someone (presumably a young woman) in Christchurch had searched for “I am 14 weeks pregnant, is this too late to have an abortion?” and she had found the post on my blog entitled What is Abortion. So I wrote about this on my Facebook wall,

Facebook allows you to have a picture with your link, and so I chose the picture of the 24wk foetus who had been killed by abortion. On Friday the post had dissapeared and I could tell that Facebook had removed it because they thought it was offensive. However there was no message from Facebook to tell me anything about this. So I reposted the link, this time using the picture of the 9wk foetus (arguably less offensive).

On Saturday when I woke up I discovered that Facebook had indefinitely disabled my account, and I was unable to login. I read the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities and found that it was most likely that Facebook considered I had broken section 3.7, which states,

You will not post content that is hateful, threatening, pornographic, or that contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence.

The photos are definitely not examples of gratuitous violence. Further, these two photos did not depict violence, but rather the victims of violence. Also, under the law in the United States and in NZ (where abortion is essentially available on demand), a foetus is not seen as a life worthy of protecting, and is usually seen as a non-person. How then, can killing this entity be an act of violence if there is nothing wrong with it; if it is merely a medical procedure? Do we call a photo of a heart transplant “violent”? I don’t think so.

I emailed them on Saturday (17 Oct) asking them to restore my account ,

…I hadn’t read the statement, so can honestly say this was not an intentional breach of the guidelines. As it is your website which you allow people to use for free, I absolutely respect your right to make any regulations you wish. Could you please re-enable my account? I have now read the statement of rights and will adhere to it in the future.

To their credit, Facebook responded early yesterday morning (21 Oct),

Your account has been suspended because you posted content through Facebook’s Links application that has been removed for violating Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Links that include drug use, nudity, or other graphic or sexually suggestive content are not allowed, nor are links that depict violence or that attack an individual or group of people. Unfortunately, for technical and security reasons, we are unable to provide further information about the removed link.

However, after reviewing your situation, we have reactivated your account…

My mate wrote on his wall to let people known I’d been removed from Facebook – here’s some of the feedback…

Why would you post a picture of an aborted baby? It’s abusively offensive
>> Its abusively offensive to abort a baby.
>>Pro-lifers are abusively offensive.

That is ridiculous. If I posted a kidney or a tonsil I bet I wouldn’t be banned. If it is just tissue that can be electively removed then what is the problem? How can tissue be offensive?

Are you serious!?!?!? Wow, and they allow facebook groups that promote genocide (including of Jews) instead??

While I believe Facebook technically misapplied their own standards in deciding to disable my account, and were wrong in that they removed two of my posts and disabled my account without even a warning, overall I’ve been happy with their response and the resolution of this incident.

abortion23

Post navigation

Previous: Breast Cancer Foundation Deathly Silent on Abortion/Breast Cancer link
Next: NZ Abortion Study Rattles ALRANZ

Related Posts

10 of the Best Hardcore Anti-Abortion Anthems

February 4, 2015February 4, 2015 Andy

Why didn’t Frank Ritchie Disclose he was until recently a Green Party Member?

June 15, 2014June 29, 2014 Andy

Exposed: Greens’ Abortion Policy Written by ALRANZ

June 9, 2014June 9, 2014 Andy

6 thoughts on “The Facebook Incident”

  1. theannalyzer says:
    October 21, 2009 at 8:10 am

    You realize this is a great angle we could argue from … Placards with one of those photos, with a caption saying something like: "It doesn't matter, it's only tissue."

    Reply
  2. theannalyzer says:
    October 21, 2009 at 8:12 am

    I was thinking how we could write a full article like that, actually, writing as a pseudo-anti-pro-lifer. Lol. Maybe God is using your fb disabling for good? 🙂

    Reply
  3. Andy Moore says:
    October 21, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    God uses everything for our good Anna… 😛 Yes, I am keen to look into that suggestion.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: ALRANZ Supporting Illegal, Self-Abortion Procedure | Star Studded Super Step
  5. Pingback: Andy Moore vs. Facebook, Round 2 | Star Studded Super Step
  6. Pingback: Andy Moore vs. Facebook, Round 2 | ThirtyOne8

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright All Rights Reserved | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.